Oct 042011
 

Now available for download is Article 34, the PDF version of the “APR Special #1,” Bell D188A Mach 2 VTOL Strike Fighter, already available as a printed book through MagCloud. The PDF file has been compressed somewhat to make the filesize manageable, but it still comes in at a hefty 60 megabytes. In that you get the full 72 page, full-color book packed with data, diagrams, artwork and photos… just in electronic format. And for the low, low, incredibly low price of only five bucks!


Check out the other Aerospace Projects Review available for download: http://www.up-ship.com/eAPR/articles.htm

 Posted by at 6:13 pm
Oct 042011
 

In recent decades, the first “A” in NASA – “Aeronautics” – has received the short end of the attention and funding stick. At the same time, aeronautics has not exactly leaped forward. Feel free to draw a link, or conclude that “correlation does not equal causation.” Whichever makes you happy.

Still, NASA has been pushing industry a little bit in the last few years for advanced jetliner ideas. Mostly the goal is for low fuel-cost airliners; in order to be more PC, these are being sold more for their supposed environmental friendliness than their lower cost of operation. In any event, the designs have included not only alternate fuel designs (such as hydrogen) but even all-electric jetliners… whopping great battery packs which would be swapped out between flights rather than conventional refueling operations.

Lockheed has been working on this as well as Boeing. While Lockheed hasn’t built an airliner since the L-1011, they’ve retained some interest in SST’s, occasionally cranking out a design for a large passenger jet or a small corporate jet. But the economic collapse and the increased price of oil have pretty much put the kibosh on those plans. But they’ve also produced artwork for subsonic designs. While diagrams and good technical data have so far evaded me, some art is available showing a high efficiency subsonic concept. The future is entirely conventional in appearance, but box wings of high aspect ration have replace the conventional wing and tail. Suspended from the aft wing are turbofan engines of extremely high bypass ratio. The result should be a design with impressive fuel economy.

Note that the wings on this jetliner have unusually high aspect ratios (i.e. they’re “skinny”). High AR wings are more efficient. But high AR wings are also structurally weak, prone to simply snapping off. The “box wing” arrangement allows the aircraft to have two high AR wings joined at the tip, making them much, much more structurally sound. Plus, the vertical surface at the tip serves as a tip-fin, increasing efficiency further.

Example: take a wood or aluminum yard stick. A very “floppy” structure. Now take two and tape the ends together, like the box wing. Hold the other ends apart and fix then to another piece of wood or some such (replicating the fuselage). If you mount one yardstick low and the other high – like the box wing – you’ll find that this is a surprisingly rigid structure.

This post originally appeared HERE.

Oct 042011
 

One of the final designs produced by the Martin Company was this blunt-nosed vehicle, designed by Hans Multhopp.

The paintings below were photographed at the Ira G. Ross Niagara Aerospace Museum archive; both of these were painted on thick matt board. Nothing beats a well-rendered hand-made illustration.

Note the inclusion of a turbojet engine for landing purposes, a common design element at this stage in the program. The vehicle was not intended to be orbital, but sub-orbital, lofted by a Titan I ICBM or derivative. As such, it was much less sensitive to weight issues.

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 3:44 pm
Oct 042011
 

1975 Boeing concept drawings, copied pretty much directly from a Rockwell study from 1971, for a space station to orbit the moon and serve as a way-station for surface exploration. Max crew of 8 in an 111 km circular lunar-polar orbit. The surface operations would be sorties of four men lasting up to one month. The lunar landers (derived from orbital tugs) would be single-stage, reusable and capable of hauling a fair amount of cargo.

The North American Rockwell concept diagram from 1971 is below. The configuration of the station is identical, down to some of the notation on the drawing, but more details are included. Note the interior views of the modules.

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 12:42 pm