Jun 092013
 

A trio of NASA-Marshall heavy lift launch vehicle concepts, circa 1985. The first two configurations used a clustered booster stage; the third configuration used series staging, with a unique feature than the booster stage had no LOX tank, only a kerosene tank. The LOX for the first stage was contained within the second stage. This would make the vehicle more complex, but it would also make the first stage more recoverable.

The three designs were designed for the same mission, launching 300,000 pounds to LEO (specifically a 100X540 nautical mile transfer orbit, with circularization at 540 n. mi. to be performed by a kick stage).  All three used an all-new LOX/kerosene booster engine, the Space Transportation Booster Engine, slightly more powerful than the F-1. All three used a new LOX/LH2 upper stage engine, the Space Transportation Main Engine, on the core vehicle. The STME used an extendable nozzle for good performance at both low and high altitude.

The selected configuration was #2:

 

The boosters for Configuration 2 were independently recoverable. The five STMEs for the core stage were contained in a recoverable propulsion & avionics module, which would splash down for recovery, refurbishment and reuse.

 Posted by at 12:31 am

  2 Responses to “HLLV”

  1. Oooh, I know this one! You want NASA TM-86520, “Heavy Lift Launch Vehicles for 1995 and Beyond”. Design mission for these three suckers was 300,000 pounds to a 540 nautical mile circular polar orbit. Why? I have no idea.

    Option II was preferred, and launch rates were expected to require two pads. Gross liftoff weight would’ve been 8.5 million pounds, and the uprated version (all 4 LRBs being the 2-engine version) would only lift 600,000 lbs to 100 nmi due east from KSC.

    Various entertaining Shuttle derivatives were suggested to use the LRBs, as well as an intermediate payload vehicle capable of 123,000 lbs to LEO. Oh, and the core stage was to have a recoverable propulsion/avionics module.

    • Right you are! Post repaved in accordance. Seems the report you mentioned is one of those that has been redacted from NTRS… good thing that the NTRS was not the only source.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)